Go to the Paralympics Home Page

Classification of Paralympic Sports

General Classification Information

Classification Handbook and Forms

The following handbook and forms are formatted as PDF files, viewable using Adobe's Acrobat Reader.
If you don't already have Acrobat Reader you may download the latest version here -

Paralympics New Zealand Classification Handbook & Procedures

Blindness Grading Form

Registration Form for Athletes with an Intellectual Disability

Application Form for Classification ID Card

Classification 'Out of Competition' Protest Form

Classifier Application Form

 

General Classification Information

 

Why do we Classify Athletes with a Disability?

The classification of athletes with disabilities in sport is an attempt to ensure fair competition. The classification system enables athletes to compete at the highest level, regardless of individual differences in physical function. In order to achieve this, many years of hard work has gone into developing classification systems that level the playing field for athletes with disabilities in all Paralympic sports.

 

The Purpose of the Classification Process

An efficient classification system must;

  • Enable fair and equitable competition.
  • Give each athlete with a disability an equal opportunity to compete at international level.
  • Only measure functional limitations caused by the physical disability.
  • Be as simple as possible so that it can be used in a consistent way in every participating country.
  • Be sport specific.

  The following should NOT under any circumstances affect an athlete's class in any sport;

  • Sporting skills or natural talent.
  • Genetic superiority or inferiority.
  • Body size or type, i.e. height, strength, length of arms etc.
  • Gender.
  • Training affect.
  • The use of strapping that provides stability and allows enhanced techniques.

 

Sport Specific Classification Systems

All Paralympic sports have individual classification systems that have identified key areas that affect performance in their particular sport. Classification is very much based on specific function when related to individual sporting technique.

    For example, a major functional aspect in the sport of wheelchair rugby is trunk function. An athlete with trunk function will be significantly advantaged to an athlete with no trunk control. Therefore, points awarded for the trunk are significantly higher than points awarded for biceps function. Consequently, it is essential that an athlete competing in two or more sports receive a classification for each sport, as each classification will differ.

 

General Classification Proceedure

The classification of most Paralympic sports consists of two tests. Each test assesses the physical potential of the athlete. All information gained from these tests is held by Paralympics New Zealand and also by the New Zealand sport specific governing body. All information is confidential.  

The Bench Test

This consists of a physical examination to ascertain exactly in what areas the athlete's disability affects the athlete's physical function.  This test should be conducted in a private room and will be recorded on a test sheet for future use. This test varies depending on the disability, the presentation of the disability and the sport being classified for. Below are examples of various bench tests and the manner in which they are assessed.  Please note that these systems are not exact and will be very dependent on the classification system in place for the specific sport.

  • A Muscle Test examines the strength of the affected muscles and is used when testing spinal cord and related injuries.  This is usually performed using the following system.

    0   Total lack of voluntary contraction.
    1   Faint contraction without any movement of the limb (a flicker).
    2   Contraction with very weak movement with gravity eliminated (poor).
    3   Contraction with movement against gravity (fair).
    4   Contraction with moderate resistance (good).
    5   Contraction of normal strength though the full range of movement against full resistance (normal).

  • A Coordination Test examines the affect of the disability on the athlete's coordination. This will be conducted at a variety of speeds in order to ascertain the true functional ability at all speeds. This test is usually conducted on those athletes with types of Cerebral Palsy and neuromuscular disorders. The following illustrates how the test is graded.

    0   No functional movement at all.
    1   Very severely restricted range of movement due to muscle stiffness and/or very minimally coordinated movements.
    2   Severely restricted range of movement with severe spasticity/muscle stiffness present and/or severe coordination problems.
    3   Moderate range of movement, moderate spasticity with tone restricting movement and/or moderate coordination problems.
    4   Almost full range of movement, with slight spasticity and slight increase in muscle tone and/or slight coordination problems.
    5   Normal.

  • Range of Movement is tested by using the following scale.  Reduced range of movement can severely affect an athlete's performance, however, range is only a factor when dealing with a disability and not an unassociated injury.

    0   No functional range of movement
    1   Slight functional range of movement
    2   25% functional range of movement
    3   50% functional range of movement
    4   75% functional range of movement
    5   Normal function range of movement for the specific sport.

The Demonstration of Technique Test

This consists of the athlete demonstrating techniques used in the sport.   As mentioned before different sports test in different manners.  For example;

  • In swimming the athlete is required to perform a variety of skills in the water, where the classifier will   analysis the athlete performance taking into consideration the results gained from the bench test.
  • In wheelchair rugby the athlete is required to demonstrate a number of ball skills, such as throwing and dribbling and also the athlete's maneuverability of their chair will also be tested.

 

Visual Review During Competition

Integral to any classification testing procedure is the analysis of the athlete during competition. Competition enables the classifier to ascertain the true functional potential of the athlete, as this is the definitive sporting environment.  Many sports have a 'review' policy that enables a classifier to monitor an athlete's classification over time. It is not unusual for athletes to be observed over a period of a year or more. However, this is no way has any disadvantages to an individual and should not be perceived as a threatening situation. It is the job of classifier to ensure fair play and it is only fair to the athlete and those participating in that sport that the classifiers take every opportunity to ensure a correct classification is made.

 

Higher rather than Lower

Each classification system is not infallible and athletes sometimes do not fit exactly in the systems in place. When a classifier is unsure of the exact classification of a particular athlete the following procedure is followed.

  • Allocate a higher, rather than lower classification grading for that athlete. This enables the athlete to compete in the sport. Over the years it has proved to be less damaging to the athlete to start at a higher classification (i.e. the more able grade) and if necessary drop the athlete a grade rather than the reverse. It can be extremely unsettling to an athlete to be raised a level in classification.
  • The athlete will then be observed for a period of time in both competition and training if necessary in order to allocate a true classification.  This process can continue throughout the career of an athlete.

 

Classification Protest

Possible reasons for the protest of a classification are;

  • Progressive condition directly affected by the disability.
  • An increase in potential function by the athlete.
  • Wrongly classified.

An athlete may have a difference of opinion with their classification. If an athlete does not agree with a classification of an individual, be it themselves or a competitor, the following procedures must be adhered to.

  • All tournaments held both nationally and internationally will have a set protocol for the protest of a classification.  This will usually require the protest to be made through the team manager/coach and there will be a protest fee involved. The protest fee is returned if the classification is found to be incorrect. This is to reduce the number of grudge or uninformed protests. The same procedure will be used when protesting a classification out of competition.
  • The protest must be made in writing and only then will it be considered by the protest panel. The written request must contain an outline of the reason for the protest based upon and citing where the athlete's physical profile does not fit their allocated class.
  • The protest panel will then endeavour to confirm the classification status of the individual involved in the protest. The athletes will be given the opportunity to present themselves for a classification review.  This could involve nothing more than a close look on court to performing a new bench and 'demonstration of technique' test.  Following discussions the decision of the Classification Panel shall be passed on to the protestor.
  • If protest is reviewed and the classification is changed during a tournament, the athlete concerned will continue to play under their original classification.  This is to avoid changing the line-ups of team sports and to avoid any distress to the athlete during competition.

Any decision on a classification by the Classification panel is final and will not be reconsidered within a year of the protest, unless certified medical evidence exists showing that the competitor has a progressive condition affecting their physical or sensory ability.

 

Minimal Disability

If an athlete cannot be placed in any of the available classes then the athlete cannot be allowed to compete in either Paralympics New Zealand regional and national competitions or IPC international competition.

 

Classifiers

Workshops consisting of theory and practical sessions are held for classifiers. Participants for classifier courses must be suitably qualified and recognised by both their national sporting body and Paralympics New Zealand. It is important to note that classifiers are professional people who volunteer their free time to classify athletes with disabilities.

 

Code of Conduct for the Classification Process

Classifiers must;

Respect the Athlete and their Coach.

  • Maintain a courteous attitude during the classification process.
  • Involve the athlete and coach/team leader in discussions in matters pertaining to their  classification and explain the results.
  • Handle protests in a fair, non-threatening and non-arbitrary manner.

Respect the Rules.

  • Establish clearly defined procedures for the classification and follow them.
  • Make the procedures widely known to athletes and their coaches/team leaders.

Respect each Individual Classifier.

  • Treat each discussion as confidential information.
  • Maintain confidentiality of the athlete's information wherever possible.
  • Do not criticize other classifiers in public - the Chairperson or Head Classifier shall act as spokesperson.
  • Remember you are acting for the sport and the classification process and not for your region or nation.

Athletes must;

  • Arrive for classification in a timely manner.
  • All athletes must present themselves for classification with all their personal aids, adaptations, prosthesis, orthotics, swimming togs, playing chairs etc that they intend to compete with. There is no exception to this rule. The athlete may be accompanied by their coach/team manager/parent if they wish.
  • All athletes must give full effort and co-operation. Any athlete not fully co-operating with the classification process will not be given a classification and will therefore not be eligible to compete.
  • It is the responsibility of all those involved in the classification process to educate themselves regarding the proper procedure and assure that the procedure is followed.
  • All athletes must respect and adhere to the decision of the classification team.  Any queries / complaints must be referred to the Chairperson or Head Classifier of the classification team.

Local Associations / Sport Specific Groups

  • Classifiers must be given ample notice of tournaments/events requiring their attendance.
  • Sporting Organisations must respect the decision of all classifiers. Any queries regarding specific classification must be referred to Paralympics New Zealand.

The following is to be provided the duration of the tournament/event.

  • A private room with a bench.
  • A timetable of athletes needing classifying stating their details and time of classification.

 

Recommendations for Classification at Tournaments/Events

  • Information detailing provision for classification should be distributed to all organisations involved in event organisation.
  • Details of events where classification will be available will be distributed at the start of each year. It is Paralympics New Zealand's intent that at least 75% of all athletes in all sports are classified prior to PNZ Nationals.
  • All test sheets of those athletes competing must be available to the classifiers at the events specified above. There will be no exception to this rule.

    Paralympics New Zealand will provide the following for all classification registered tournaments;

  • A bench for classifying.
  • A classification pack, containing all essential measuring equipment.
  • Appropriate International test sheets.